In January 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order seeking to end automatic U.S. citizenship for children born in the country to parents who are not lawful permanent residents or U.S. citizens. This action has sparked widespread legal debate and strong reactions from lawmakers, constitutional scholars, and civil rights organizations.
Media Coverage and Public Response
Major news outlets, including CNN and NBC, have extensively covered the executive order and its potential implications. CNN reported that a federal judge in Seattle issued an immediate temporary injunction, blocking the order’s implementation and calling it a “blatant constitutional overreach.” NBC News highlighted that the order directly contradicts the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which has historically guaranteed birthright citizenship to all individuals born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents’ immigration status.
Legal analysts note that the executive order is likely to face prolonged court challenges, with several states and civil rights organizations already filing lawsuits against the administration.
Legal and Legislative Challenges
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, includes the Citizenship Clause, which states:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Constitutional experts argue that any attempt to alter this provision would require a constitutional amendment rather than an executive order. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), along with other civil rights groups, has already initiated legal action, arguing that the order is unconstitutional and violates established legal precedents.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated that the executive order is “an unmistakable violation of constitutional principles and a reckless attempt to undermine over a century of legal precedent.” He also emphasized that any substantial change to birthright citizenship must go through the constitutional amendment process, which requires broad legislative and state-level approval.
Obstacles to Amending the 14th Amendment
For any significant change to the Citizenship Clause, the administration would need to pursue a constitutional amendment, which requires:
1. Approval by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate
2. Ratification by three-fourths (38 out of 50) of the U.S. states
Legal scholars widely agree that achieving this level of consensus is highly improbable, given the current political landscape and strong bipartisan support for the constitutional protections provided by the 14th Amendment.
Conclusion
President Trump’s executive order faces immediate and significant legal challenges, with federal courts already stepping in to block its enforcement. Constitutional scholars and civil rights organizations argue that the order exceeds presidential authority and is unlikely to survive judicial scrutiny. Given the high legal and legislative barriers, any attempt to modify or restrict birthright citizenship would require an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, making such a change unlikely in the foreseeable future.
Further Developments
The matter is expected to reach the Supreme Court, where justices will likely assess whether the executive branch has the authority to interpret and restrict the Citizenship Clause outside of the constitutional amendment process. Until then, birthright citizenship remains protected under current U.S. law.
Watch more in the video:
